Bulletin n. 2-3/2012
October 2012-February 2013
CONTENTS
  • Section A) The theory and practise of the federal states and multi-level systems of government
  • Section B) Global governance and international organizations
  • Section C) Regional integration processes
  • Section D) Federalism as a political idea
    • Valentini Laura
    Kant, Ripstein and the Circle of Freedom: A Critical Note
    in European Journal of Philosophy , Volume 20, Issue 3, September 2012 ,  2012 ,  450-459
    The full text is free: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00554.x/abstract Abstract Much contemporary political philosophy claims to be Kant-inspired, but its aims and method differ from Kant's own. In his recent book, Force and Freedom, Arthur Ripstein advocates a more orthodox Kantian outlook, presenting it as superior to dominant (Kant-inspired) views. The most striking feature of this outlook is its attempt to ground the whole of political morality in one right: the right to freedom, understood as the right to be independent of others’ choices. Is Ripstein's Kantian project successful? In this research note I argue that it is not. First, I suggest that Ripstein's notion of freedom is viciously circular. It is meant to ground all rights, but in fact it presupposes an account of those rights. Second, I show that—independently of its inability to ground a whole political morality—such a moralized understanding of freedom is normatively unappealing.
    ©2001 - 2020 - Centro Studi sul Federalismo - P. IVA 94067130016