Bullettin n. 1/2011 | ||
June 2011 | ||
Follesdal Andreas |
||
The distributive justice of a global basic structure: A category mistake? | ||
in Politics, Philosophy & Economics , Vol. 10, n. 1, February , 2011 , 46-65 | ||
The present article explores ‘anti-cosmopolitan’ arguments that shared institutions above the state, such as there are, are not of a kind that support or give rise to distributive claims beyond securing minimum needs. The upshot is to rebut certain of these ‘anti-cosmopolitan’ arguments. Section 1 asks under which conditions institutions are subject to distributive justice norms. That is, which sound reasons support claims to a relative share of the benefits of institutions that exist and apply to individuals? Such norms may require strict equality, Rawls’ Difference Principle, or other constraints on inequality. Section 2 considers, and rejects, several arguments why existing international institutions are not thought to meet these conditions. | ||