Bulletin n. 1/2017 | ||
June 2017 | ||
Mendelski Martin |
||
Das europäische Evaluierungsdefizit der Rechtsstaatlichkeit | ||
in Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft , Jahrgang 44 (2016), Heft 3 , 2016 , 366-398 | ||
Abstract Liberal representatives of the European Union (EU) and adherents of liberal constitutionalism assess the recent „constitutional crises“ in Central and Eastern Europe as an attack on democracy and the rule of law. This one-sided assessment results, among others, from an inadequate rule of law evaluation methodology. The author of this paper identifies the EU’s rule of law evaluation deficit, which is reflected in three fundamental problems: (1) A quantitative “more is better” mindset, (2) A biased assessment of the rule of law, (3) Partisan “rhetoric action” in the name of the rule of law. The EU’s evaluation deficit is illustrated with selected examples of judicial reform and constitutional crises in CEE (e.g. Romania, Poland, Hungary). It is argued that given the EU’s inability to objectively and systematically assess the rule of law, the EU should either abstain from evaluating rule of law in member states and candidate countries or change its deficient evaluation approach, for instance by following the policy advice provided in this paper. | ||