Bulletin n. 1/2017
June 2017
  • Section A) The theory and practise of the federal states and multi-level systems of government
  • Section B) Global governance and international organizations
  • Section C) Regional integration processes
  • Section D) Federalism as a political idea
  • Armin Steinbach
    Effect-based analysis in the court's jurisprudence on the euro crisis
    in European Law Review , volume 42, issue 2 ,  2017 ,  254-269
    Effect-based analysis is genuinely implicit in economic reasoning. The jurisprudence developed throughout the debt crisis reveals frequent recourse to effect-based analysis for the legal assessment of the compatibility of anti-crisis instruments with EU law. The dividing line between the European Court of Justice (ECJ) (in Gauweiler and Pringle) and the German constitutional court (in its request for a preliminary ruling on the OMT programme) can be drawn according to whether spill-over effects for the purpose of delineating monetary from fiscal policy are recognised or not. This difference inspires the diverging answers the courts give on whether the European Central Bank (ECB) acted within its mandate. This article examines the scope and nature of the Courtís effects orientation and seeks to analyse the underlying economic rationale guiding the Courtís interpretation of the relevant EU Treaty normsóthis analysis led the ECJ to results that conflicted with the analysis of the German constitutional court. The different (economic) understandings adopted by the courts are also explored in light of the functionality of interest rates in relation to monetary and fiscal policy.
    ©2001 - 2020 - Centro Studi sul Federalismo - P. IVA 94067130016